What’s the Point of Building Cars, Anyway?

In January 2017, the Detroit auto show had to share the headlines with an FBI arrest, a billion-dollar penalty, and a federal Notice of Violation. Volkswagen executive Oliver Schmidt was detained at a Florida airport over Dieselgate, Takata agreed to pay $1 billion for its deadly airbag inflators, and the EPA accused Fiat Chrysler of undisclosed emissions software on roughly 104,000 diesel trucks and SUVs. Why should muscle car fans care about any of it? Read on for what those three scandals say about the industry that builds the cars we love.

January in the car business is supposed to belong to the Detroit show, with its new-model reveals, concept cars, and horsepower headlines. The January this story ran, the reveals had competition. Within a few weeks, the FBI arrested a Volkswagen executive at a Florida airport, an airbag supplier agreed to pay a billion-dollar penalty, and the EPA told Fiat Chrysler that big trouble was coming. Three of the biggest names in the industry were in the news for exactly the wrong reasons, all at once. For anyone who loves cars, that raised an uncomfortable question the original author asked directly: what is the point of building cars if the companies building them cannot be trusted? Here is what was really behind those headlines.

⚑ Featured Gear

Start Car Conversations →

As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

An Arrest at a Florida Airport

In January 2017, FBI agents arrested Volkswagen executive Oliver Schmidt at a Florida airport and charged him with conspiracy to defraud the United States over his role in the company’s diesel emissions cheating. The arrest was a turning point because it put a face on a scandal that had until then been discussed mostly in terms of fines and recalls. An executive in handcuffs, detained while trying to leave the country, sent a very different message than a corporate press release, and it landed in the same week the industry wanted the world looking at its newest cars in Detroit.

How Dieselgate Got There

The Schmidt arrest was the latest chapter in a scandal that broke in September 2015, when U.S. regulators revealed that Volkswagen had installed software on its diesel cars that recognized emissions testing and switched the engine into a cleaner mode only for the test. On the road, the cars emitted far more pollution than allowed. The affair, quickly nicknamed Dieselgate, had already cost Volkswagen billions in fines and settlements by the time federal agents caught up with Schmidt, and the criminal charges made clear that regulators were no longer content to let the company simply write checks.

Takata’s Billion-Dollar Bill

At almost the same time, Takata agreed to pay a $1 billion criminal penalty, including $975 million in restitution, to resolve the fallout from its defective airbag inflators. The inflators could rupture and send metal fragments into the cabin, and the defect was tied to multiple deaths and one of the largest automotive recalls in history, spanning many brands that had bought the parts. Unlike an emissions scandal, this one was not about a number on a lab report. It was about a safety device that was supposed to protect drivers and instead became the thing that hurt them.

The EPA Comes for Fiat Chrysler

Then, on January 12, 2017, the EPA issued Fiat Chrysler a formal Notice of Violation over undisclosed software in roughly 104,000 diesel Ram 1500 pickups and Jeep Grand Cherokees. The agency alleged the software allowed the vehicles to emit more pollution on the road than they did during testing, the same basic accusation that had brought down Volkswagen. FCA disputed the characterization, but the timing was brutal. The company that built the Hellcat and the Ram was suddenly answering the same questions as Volkswagen, in the middle of the industry’s biggest week of the year.

Why It All Landed in Detroit Show Week

The second and third weeks of January are when the North American International Auto Show turns Detroit into the center of the car world, and automakers spend the year planning reveals for that window. In 2017, the arrest, the penalty, and the Notice of Violation stacked up almost on top of each other in that same window, which is why the original author noticed that the punishments were getting as much attention as the products. It was a rare month when the legal pages of the automotive press were more crowded than the reveal coverage.

Trust Is the Real Product

None of the three stories was about horsepower or design, and that is the point. They were about trust, and about what happens when companies decide that testing compliance is optional. A buyer cannot personally verify an emissions result or an airbag inflator. They take the manufacturer’s word for it, and the entire business runs on that word being good. When three major names break it in one month, the damage reaches beyond the specific models involved. It makes every spec sheet, every safety rating, and every certification a little harder to believe.

What This Meant for Enthusiasts

Muscle car fans might assume diesel emissions and airbag inflators are someone else’s problem, but the fallout reaches the performance world directly. Regulators burned by defeat devices look harder at every piece of software that changes how an engine behaves, which includes aftermarket tuning. Safety recalls tighten rules on parts suppliers. And the political appetite for strict enforcement, which had softened in the years before 2015, came back with real force. For anyone who wants to keep buying, modifying, and driving high-performance cars, an industry that regulators trust is a much friendlier place than one they do not.

The Muscle Car Era Already Learned This Lesson

The original muscle car era did not end because buyers stopped wanting big engines. It ended when emissions and safety rules arrived in the early 1970s and the industry was slow to engineer real solutions, leaving compression ratios and horsepower ratings to collapse. Scandals like the ones in January 2017 are the modern version of the same mistake: treating the rules as an obstacle to game rather than a constraint to engineer around. The companies that eventually revived performance did it by meeting the rules honestly, which is why a modern V8 can be both clean and faster than anything from 1970.

Compliance as Real Engineering

The counterexample to a defeat device is the modern performance car itself. A supercharged Hemi that passes emissions and crash standards while making enormous power is a bigger engineering achievement than anything built by cheating a test. That is what makes the January 2017 headlines so frustrating from an enthusiast’s perspective. The same industry that could build those cars had, in three separate cases, decided shortcuts were easier. Every dollar spent on penalties and restitution was a dollar not spent on the honest engineering that actually moves the hobby forward.

So What Is the Point of Building Cars?

The original author’s question deserves a straight answer. The point of building cars is the same as it has always been: to give people something worth driving, built by companies that can be trusted to tell the truth about what they built. Performance bragging rights and brand loyalty are the fun part, but they rest on a foundation of safety, honesty, and following the rules regulators actually wrote. January 2017 was a reminder of how quickly that foundation can crack, and why fans of horsepower should care about it as much as anyone.

Share your thoughts in the comments below.

Republished by Blog Post Promoter