Restoring a Classic: 1970 Ford F100 Transformation | Built VS Bought

This fully restored 1970 Ford F100 pickup, featured on Built VS Bought, blends vintage American muscle with a modern touch — sleek body lines, a redone interior, and the kind of attention to detail that has viewers calling it one of the most tastefully done F100 builds they’ve seen. It isn’t a patina show piece or a garage-queen trailer find. It’s a truck built to be driven, admired, and argued about in the comments. Watch to see what “Built, Not Bought” really means in practice.

There is a particular kind of pickup truck that gets driven into a shop looking like a rust-colored ghost of itself, and comes out looking like it never spent fifty years fighting weather, time, and neglect. This 1970 Ford F100 belongs to that category, and the team behind it did not simply patch over the damage — they treated the whole truck as though it deserved a second life it never got the first time around. What makes this build different from the dozens of other F100 restorations floating around YouTube is not just the finish, it’s the reasoning behind every choice made along the way. Watch how far “Built, Not Bought” actually goes when the crew means it.

From Rusted Relic to Rolling History

“Built VS Bought” frames every project around a simple tension: the difference between a truck someone paid a shop to finish overnight and one that was actually restored, panel by panel, with intention. This F100 began life as what the show’s own description calls a “rusted relic” before the crew brought it back with what they describe as precision and a respect for its heritage. That distinction matters in the classic truck world, where shortcuts get spotted fast by anyone who has spent time under one of these trucks. Viewers picked up on it immediately, with one commenter calling it “one of the most tastefully done F100’s I’ve seen,” praising the attention to detail rather than just the paint.

⚑ Featured Gear

Start Car Conversations →

As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

Why the Fourth-Generation F100 Still Turns Heads

The 1970 F100 sits inside Ford’s fourth-generation F-Series, produced from 1967 through 1972 — a run remembered for cleaner, more integrated styling than the trucks that came before it, along with the Twin-I-Beam independent front suspension Ford introduced in 1965. That suspension setup gave these trucks a noticeably smoother ride than the solid-axle competition, which is part of why so many survive as daily drivers rather than static show pieces. The clean, unfussy sheet metal from this era has also aged well stylistically, avoiding the busier chrome trim of later decades, which is exactly why builders keep returning to these trucks four and five decades later.

The Coyote Swap Debate Nobody Finished

Buried in the comments is a builder mentioning he was mid-conversation with a friend about doing a video on his own coyote-swapped F100 when this one showed up first. The Coyote — Ford’s modern 5.0-liter V8 — has become one of the most popular modern engine swaps for classic F-Series trucks, prized for its reliability, parts availability, and the fact that it drops in with well-documented mounting kits. Whether or not this particular truck runs a period-correct engine or something newer under the hood, the swap conversation itself says something about where the F100 restoration scene has been heading.

Red, and Why It Costs More Than the Color Chart Suggests

One viewer noted, almost offhand, that red is one of the most expensive paint colors to apply correctly — and they’re right. Reds are notoriously difficult to lay down evenly because the pigment particles are larger and less opaque than most other colors, which typically means more coats, more clear coat, and more labor hours to avoid streaking or fading. On a frame-off build like this one, that additional cost and time investment is easy to overlook next to the mechanical work, but it’s often where a huge share of a restoration budget quietly disappears.

Three-On-The-Tree and a Skill Nobody Teaches Anymore

Several commenters used this F100 as an excuse to talk about learning to drive a column-shifted three-speed manual — one recalling an ’81 Ford, another a ’72 F100 with a 302 his father owned. That column-mounted three-on-the-tree shifter was standard equipment on trucks like this well into the 1970s, and it’s a driving skill that has all but disappeared from daily use. For a lot of the audience watching this restoration, the truck isn’t just a build — it’s a direct line back to a specific memory of learning to drive on a bench seat with three pedals and a column shifter.

What a Truck Like This Actually Sells For

Frame-off F100 restorations with this level of finish routinely land in the $35,000 to $60,000 range at auction, depending on drivetrain, originality, and how well-documented the build sheet is — numbers that would have seemed absurd for a “farm truck” a generation ago. The shift in perception is largely generational: buyers who grew up wanting a Mustang or Camaro are now just as likely to chase a clean vintage pickup, and the F100’s simpler mechanicals make it a more approachable restoration project than a lot of muscle cars from the same years.

How the F100 Stacks Up Against Its Rivals

The F100’s direct rivals in 1970 were Chevrolet’s C10 and Dodge’s D100, both chasing the same buyers with their own take on comfort, styling, and payload. The C10 tends to get more restoration attention today simply due to volume — Chevy sold more of them — while the D100 has become the rarer, more collectible choice among Mopar loyalists. The F100’s Twin-I-Beam ride quality was arguably the segment’s best-kept advantage during its original run, and it remains one of the reasons these trucks feel more composed on the road today than survivors from Ford’s rivals.

A Truck Built to Be Used, Not Just Displayed

What separates a build like this from a trailer queen is the intention baked into every choice — this is a truck meant to be driven, not just photographed under studio lighting. That throughline runs through everything the “Built VS Bought” channel does: showing viewers what a truck looks like when the goal is decades of use rather than a single show trophy. For a generation of enthusiasts who grew up watching this era of Ford trucks work farms and job sites, that’s the version of the story worth telling. It’s also a quieter kind of specificity than a spec sheet — proof that a truck’s real value sometimes shows up in how it gets used after the cameras stop rolling, not in the numbers printed on a build sheet.

Check out the full video above and let us know what you think in the comments.

Share your thoughts in the comments below.