A list of five supposedly forgotten muscle car V8s, set up in contrast to household names like the 426 Hemi and LS6 454, immediately sparked an argument in the comments from viewers who insist none of these engines were ever actually unknown. Along the way, commenters add their own nominees, including a Corvair sleeper that reportedly humiliated Chevelles and GTOs on the street. Watch to see which engines made the cut, and which ones viewers think got left out.
Call a list of muscle car engines “unknown” or “forgotten” and you are guaranteed one thing: a comment section full of people insisting they knew every single one personally, usually because they owned, wrenched on, or raced against it themselves back when it was new. That is almost exactly what happened here. Before the video even finishes making its case, longtime gearheads are already lining up to argue the entire premise, listing off engines the ranking left out entirely. The debate underneath ends up more interesting than the actual list.
The Six Legends Everyone Already Knows, Named Up Front
The video opens by naming the engines everyone already agrees are legends, deliberately setting up the contrast to come. The Chrysler 426 Hemi, the Chevrolet LS6 454, the Buick Stage-1 455, the Pontiac 455 HO, the Oldsmobile W-30 455, and the Ford 427 all get named up front as the biggest, most celebrated displacement kings of the muscle car era, the engines that show up on every top-ten list and every poster on a teenager’s bedroom wall. The actual five picks that follow are all smaller-displacement, comparatively overlooked engines that lived permanently in the shadow of those six famous names.
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.
Why Calling Anything Unknown Struck a Nerve With an Entire Generation
That framing struck a nerve almost immediately. One viewer flatly stated that not one of these engines is actually unknown to a true car guy, while another described the exact list as simply the best-known engines he and his friends wrenched on throughout the 1970s while working restaurant and gas station jobs. That reaction points to something the video’s title glosses over: obscurity here is entirely generational. An engine that every serious enthusiast in 1975 could identify by exhaust note alone can look genuinely forgotten to someone discovering muscle cars for the first time fifty years later.
The Small-Block Legends Commenters Added to the List
Commenters added their own small-block nominees almost immediately, and the list they produced reads like a highlight reel of genuine bargain performance. The Ford K-code 289, especially the 306-horsepower version that powered the 1965 Shelby GT350, came up repeatedly as an unsung favorite. So did Chrysler’s 340 Six Barrel, the engine underneath both the AAR Cuda and Challenger T/A, with one commenter calling the 340-powered Duster, Dart, and Demon possibly the best performance bargain of the entire muscle car era, delivering big-block feel from a genuinely affordable small-block package.
The Sleeper Nobody Would Have Seen Coming: An L79 in a Corvair
One story buried in the comments describes a sleeper nobody would see coming even today. A modified L79 327, Chevrolet’s high-output small-block, stuffed into the back seat of a 1966 Corvair Corsa, a rear-engine compact never designed to carry anything close to that kind of power. According to the commenter who built it, that Corvair regularly embarrassed Chevelles, GTOs, Boss Mustangs, and Road Runners on the street roughly forty years ago, proof that the era’s most memorable street victories did not always come from the cars anyone expected to win.
The Engines That Predate the Big Three’s Own Muscle Car Marketing
Several nominations reached outside the Big Three entirely, into territory even dedicated muscle car fans tend to overlook. Studebaker’s supercharged R2 289 and even wilder R3 304.5 engines, built for a company that stopped producing cars in the United States by 1966, drew genuine praise as giant-killers in their day, with the R3’s bored-out block existing purely as insurance against big-block bullies. American Motors’ 390, reportedly making around 315 horsepower in a period AMX, and Chrysler’s Super Commando 273, rated at 235 horsepower yet still punching well above a small-block’s weight class, both came up as engines that get erased from muscle car conversations simply because they never came from Ford, GM, or Chrysler’s most famous performance divisions.
A Pontiac Salesman’s Own Origin Story From 1969
One of the richest comments came from a Pontiac salesman who worked the floor in 1969, describing how his dealership ordered a 350 HO four-speed Custom S specifically to compete with the Plymouth Road Runner’s price advantage over the GTO. The car did exactly the job it was built for on the sales floor, but the dealership refused to keep any in inventory, forcing salespeople to special-order each one after securing a buyer first. By his own account, that policy meant the dealership only managed to sell six or seven of them that entire year, a small, specific data point that no spec sheet or magazine road test from the era ever bothered to record.
Why Forgotten Is Relative to When You Were Paying Attention
What ties every one of these comments together is the same underlying point: forgotten is relative to when you happened to be paying attention. An engine that was the default choice for a broke twenty-year-old wrenching in 1974 can look exotic and obscure to someone encountering muscle cars for the first time through a YouTube video decades later, and preserving exactly that kind of firsthand detail, salesman stories, sleeper builds, and engine codes nobody bothered writing down officially, is precisely why comment sections on videos like this one end up as valuable as the video itself.
The Nominations Even Dedicated Enthusiasts Had to Look Up
A handful of commenters also nominated engines most viewers, even dedicated ones, would need to look up: the Studebaker Avanti’s fiberglass-bodied R4, a supercharged 289 stuffed into a car barely larger than a modern compact and lighter than most of them, and Pontiac’s W53 Sprint Six, a genuinely quick factory six-cylinder option that gets mentioned in the same breath as V8 legends purely out of respect for how it performed against expectations. Neither one shows up on a typical muscle car poster, but both point to the same underlying theme running through this entire comment section: real performance history was never limited to the handful of engines famous enough to get their own dedicated documentaries. A ranked list of five can only ever be a starting point for an argument this deep. That is exactly what the comment section proves, one obscure engine code at a time. Read through it once and the original ranking starts to feel almost incomplete by comparison.
Hit play on the full video and share your take in the comments below.
Share your thoughts in the comments below.
Republished by Blog Post Promoter










