20 thoughts on “Challenger SRT8 vs 340 Six Pack Challenger T/A – Old vs New – 1/4 Mile – Road Test TV”

1. The guy in the SRT8 is HORRIBLE! That’s a 12 to 12.5 second car. He had NO grip!

   As for the 340, I’m surprised. I figured it was a 13-14 second car. Putting down 12s was excellent.

   1. that 340 should be closer to 15 second car, the hemi’s were 13 to 14’s… I agree the snowflake driving that SRT had no clue or balls to really race that car

   2. I think the 340 was pretty heavily modified, too. It definitely had better tires than the SRT8.

2. The little 340 sure surprised me

3. For a real test, drivers should swap cars.

   1. They did in the fourth race I believe it was

4. Jim Byrnes

5. Never underestimate a 340 high compression engine with 3 deuces and yes the first driver in SRT was horrible!

6. Them 340s run they were no joke

7. Well , well the 340 holds up for old school car .

8. Both need a driving lesson or two

9. I find that hard to believe

10. Love the old steel.

11. Glenn Hamilton

12. Mike Clouse Kevin Tomlin Danny Reed

13. The way I see it is simple the old skool 340 no matter which driver was the faster car.

14. Neither

15. Criss ca marche pas un SRT8 Serge Asselin

16. son ermososos✌

17. Old school looks n sounds better

Comments are closed.