Fiat Chrysler renews Cuda trademark

When Fiat Chrysler quietly renewed its trademark on the ‘Cuda name, it reignited a rumor that had simmered for nearly a decade: a modern successor to one of Mopar’s most legendary nameplates. The Cuda and Barracuda trademarks have a messier history than most fans realize, and the renewals have kept coming for years without a production car to show for it. Here’s the real story behind the paperwork.

Is Fiat Chrysler Automobiles about to resurrect the Cuda name for a modern-day muscle car?

The folks atÂ AllparÂ noticed that FCA renewed its trademark for â€œCudaâ€ with the United States Patent and Trademark Office on June 16. It follows the renewal by FCA of theÂ trademark for â€œBarracudaâ€Â in 2015.

⚑ Featured Gear

Start Car Conversations →

As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

Before you get too excited, recall that automakers routinely renew trademarks with such filings in order to prevent other firms from using the names. Then again, weâ€™re getting awfully close to the end of production of the current Dodge Challenger. The last we heard, the replacement willÂ arrive for the 2020 model year.

There’s mounting speculation that FCA is planning two models to succeed the Dodge Challenger. One is expected to be a direct replacement keeping the Challenger name, while the other is thought to beÂ a lighter, smaller convertible modelÂ called a Barracuda or Cuda.

Whatever the outcome, expect the next generation of Dodgeâ€™s rear-wheel-drive muscle cars to use the brilliant Giorgio platform developed by Alfa Romeo. Worryingly, the switch to the new platform might coincide with aÂ switch to downsized engines.

Talk of the Barracudaâ€™s return dates back to even before Plymouth‘s demise at the start of century. The rumors never really got serious until Dodge rolled out itsÂ Challenger-based Barracuda conceptÂ at the 2007 SEMA show.

Trademark filings are usually the most boring paperwork a car company generates — until enthusiasts start treating them like tea leaves. When FCA quietly renewed its trademark for ‘Cuda back in 2017, it reignited a rumor that had already refused to die for the better part of a decade: that Dodge’s next halo model might resurrect one of Mopar’s most storied nameplates. The renewal alone proved nothing, since automakers routinely protect names they have no intention of ever using again. But the timing — right as the Challenger’s production run was winding toward its end — made the speculation impossible to ignore. Did the paperwork actually mean anything, or was it just corporate housekeeping?

A Trademark With a Complicated Past

The ‘Cuda name has a messier ownership history than most casual fans realize. FCA let its original Barracuda trademark lapse in 1985, only reapplying for it in 2012 — an application the company then let go abandoned again in 2015 after failing to complete the paperwork. The Cuda name itself is even murkier: it doesn’t appear that Chrysler or its corporate descendants ever actually held a clean, continuously renewed trademark on it before the 2017 filing, which explains why every renewal tends to make headlines rather than pass quietly.

What Actually Came of the Rumors

Despite years of speculation, and a Dodge-branded Barracuda concept reportedly shown to dealers back in 2015 riding on stretched Alfa Romeo Giulia underpinnings, no production Cuda or Barracuda ever materialized in the years that followed. Stellantis (FCA’s successor after its 2021 merger with PSA) has continued the pattern, refiling for the Cuda and Barracuda trademarks as recently as 2024, keeping the speculation alive even as the Dodge Challenger itself ended production in December 2023. Whether that persistence points toward an actual future model or just decades of habitual trademark defense remains one of Mopar fandom’s longest-running guessing games.

Part of a Bigger Nostalgia Wave

The Cuda speculation didn’t happen in isolation. Detroit spent much of the 2010s and 2020s leaning hard into retro-inspired revivals, from the Dodge Challenger’s deliberately old-school styling to Ford’s relaunch of the Bronco nameplate, each betting that decades-old brand equity could still move new metal off dealer lots. Renewed trademark filings for names like Cuda and Barracuda fit neatly into that pattern, giving automakers cheap insurance on a nameplate’s future value even when, as has repeatedly been the case here, no finished product ever follows.

Why Automakers Bother With Filings Like This at All

Defensive trademark renewals like this one are relatively inexpensive compared to the cost of losing a nameplate to a competitor or a name-squatting company, which is largely why automakers keep filing them even decades after a model has left production. A lapsed trademark can be picked up by another party, as nearly happened with Barracuda in the mid-1980s, forcing the original owner to either buy back the rights or abandon the name outright. Renewing early and often is simply cheaper insurance than trying to reclaim a beloved name after the fact.

Stellantis has since confirmed a broader electrification push across its Dodge lineup, further complicating any straightforward return of a gas-powered ‘Cuda or Barracuda. Whatever eventually wears either name next will almost certainly look and sound completely different from the naturally aspirated V8 muscle cars that originally made both nameplates famous, which is part of why longtime fans remain cautiously skeptical every time a new filing surfaces.

Until an actual production car appears, every renewed filing will likely keep generating the same cycle of speculation, headlines, and cautious optimism among Mopar loyalists. It’s a pattern enthusiasts have grown accustomed to, treating each new filing less as breaking news and more as a recurring reminder that the name hasn’t been forgotten.

Share your thoughts in the comments below.

Republished by Blog Post Promoter