The NEW Murder Nova – it’s SICK

Murder Nova is one of no-prep racing’s most recognizable names, and Shawn’s newest version swaps in a smaller 482ci Proline small-block that revs to a claimed 9,500 rpm while keeping the old car’s 88mm turbos. The debut pass split the comment section between chassis critiques and loyal fans rooting for the car to find its footing. Watch to see how the new combination performed — and why viewers immediately started calling it “2.0.”

Murder Nova is one of the most recognizable names in no-prep racing, a car with a reputation built over years of grudge matches and record passes. So when Shawn rolled out an entirely new version of it, the internet did not go easy on the debut. The new car looks the part — arguably more polished than the old one — but what it actually does on the track split viewers into two very loud camps within minutes of the video going up. Here’s what changed under the bodywork, and why the comment section couldn’t stop arguing about it.

A Smaller Motor, A Bigger Redline

The headline change, according to 1320video’s own description, is a deliberate downsize: Shawn swapped to a 482ci Proline “small-block,” a notable step down in displacement from what fans might expect on a car built to compete at this level. What makes the swap notable isn’t the smaller number, it’s what that smaller engine is capable of — a claimed rev ceiling of 9,500 rpm, an extraordinary figure for anything built around a big-inch domestic platform, let alone one still paired with serious turbocharging.

⚑ Featured Gear

Start Car Conversations →

As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

Why the 88mm Turbos Stayed Put

While the block got smaller, the turbo setup didn’t follow — Shawn kept the 88mm turbos from the previous combination. That decision suggests the goal wasn’t to reduce total power, but to change how that power gets made and delivered, likely chasing quicker spool and a more manageable powerband from an engine that can rev harder than its predecessor. Pairing a smaller, higher-revving block with unchanged turbo sizing is the kind of combination serious engine builders experiment with when chasing a specific power curve rather than just a bigger peak number.

The Nickname the Comments Wouldn’t Let Go Of

Almost immediately, commenters started referring to the car as “Murder Nova 2.0,” a label the video suggests Shawn wasn’t thrilled about. That didn’t stop the running joke — multiple commenters picked up the nickname and ran with it, half in mockery of the car’s early struggles to drive straight and half out of genuine affection for a build they clearly wanted to see succeed. By the end of the comment thread, several viewers were predicting the “2.0” name would stick regardless of how Shawn felt about it.

A Front End Fighting for Traction

Much of the debate in the comments centers on a real handling issue visible in the footage: the car’s front tires lift more than expected off the line, a sign — according to several viewers with chassis tuning experience — that the weight balance shifted when the smaller, lighter block went in. One commenter estimated the swap removed 100 to 150 pounds from the nose, exactly the kind of change that can turn a stable launch into a wheelie-prone one if the suspension isn’t adjusted to compensate.

Crowdsourced Chassis Advice From the Comments

What follows in the replies reads like an informal tuning consultation. Suggestions range from adding frontal ballast to increase downforce, to lowering the wheelie bars as far as possible, to softening the rear springs while tightening the front bias on the four-link — all aimed at keeping the front tires in contact with the track long enough for the car to hook and go straight. It’s a reminder that no-prep racing’s fanbase isn’t just watching for entertainment; a meaningful share of them know exactly what they’d change if it were their car.

Not Everyone Is Piling On

Despite the criticism, plenty of commenters came to Shawn’s defense, framing the early struggles as a normal part of debuting a fundamentally new combination. One viewer pointed out that anyone who owned Murder Nova would likely react the same way to criticism, while another simply said they were rooting for Shawn to sort the car out. That mixed reaction — equal parts constructive criticism and fan loyalty — is typical of how the no-prep community treats its most visible builds.

How the New Combination Compares to the Old Car

One commenter drew a direct line between the sound of the new small-block and the outgoing engine, noting how differently a symmetrical-port small block sounds compared to the conventional Pontiac-style engine it replaced at the same displacement — a detail that speaks to just how much changes under the surface when a team swaps architecture rather than just parts. For long-time fans of the build, differences like that are as much a part of the story as the numbers on paper.

Why Murder Nova Still Draws a Crowd

Whatever the verdict on this particular pass, the sheer volume and technical depth of the reaction shows why Murder Nova remains one of the most closely watched builds in no-prep racing. Few cars generate this level of real-time chassis analysis from viewers, and that scrutiny — welcomed or not — is part of what comes with being one of the sport’s most recognizable names.

What a Successful Debut Actually Looks Like in No-Prep

In a sport built around unpredictable track conditions and cars pushed right to the edge of controllability, a rocky first outing for a heavily revised combination isn’t unusual — it’s close to expected. The real test for Murder Nova 2.0 won’t be this single pass, but whether Shawn and his team can translate the comment section’s chassis feedback, and their own data, into a car that puts the smaller block’s higher rev range to full use without giving up the front-end stability the old car had already sorted out.

Why Fans Are Already Circling the Next Event

For a car this recognizable, every appearance doubles as a status update on the build’s progress, and this debut has already set expectations for what viewers will be watching for next time out: a straighter launch, a tamed front end, and a chance to see whether that 9,500 rpm ceiling translates into a genuine step forward on the track rather than just an impressive number on paper.

A Calculated Risk, Not Just a Rough Debut

That’s the trade-off every no-prep team accepts when they chase a fundamentally different combination instead of incrementally tweaking a proven one: short-term growing pains in exchange for a ceiling the old car simply couldn’t reach. Judging by how quickly and thoroughly the comment section broke down every detail of this first pass, plenty of fans are willing to be patient to see whether that bet pays off.

Check out the full video above and let us know what you think in the comments.

Share your thoughts in the comments below.

Republished by Blog Post Promoter