Chevrolet built this roadster during the worst economy in American history – and somehow sold nearly half a million of its kind anyway. Find out how a rebadged “Eagle” with a beaver-tail rear end and a V-shaped radiator became one of the best-selling cars of 1933, and why collectors still chase these six-cylinder survivors today.
This roadster was available in three body styles-all on a 110 inch wheel base. The original engine is a valve-in-head 181 cu in six cylinder that produces 60 bhp and puts 125 lb-ft of torque to the wheels, with a top speed of up to 70 mph. A clock, heater and AM radio were the available options in 1933.
MCF thanks Gateway Classic Cars for the images displayed here.
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.
A Depression-Era Roadster With a Surprising Backstory
Before muscle cars were even a glimmer in Detroit’s eye, there was this – a Depression-era roadster that somehow made buyers line up anyway. Chevrolet had every reason to expect disaster in 1933; the country was flat broke, and yet this little six-cylinder roadster with its V-shaped radiator and beaver-tail rear end became one of the best-selling cars in America that year. It wore an “Eagle” badge before Chevy quietly renamed the whole lineup mid-production, which tells you something about how fast this era moved. Look closely at the skirted fenders and the slanted, louvered hood and you’re looking at styling cues that would echo through Chevrolet design for the next decade. So how did a car built to survive the worst economy in American history end up this good-looking?
A Depression-Era Sales Phenomenon
Chevrolet’s Series CA line sold a combined 450,435 vehicles that year, an increase of nearly 140,000 over the prior year’s Series BA – a remarkable number given the economic climate buyers were living through. Pricing helped: Sport Roadster models started around $485, climbing to $565 for a sedan, genuinely affordable transportation dressed up with real style. The name shuffle is part of the fun too – the car launched wearing an “Eagle” badge, then got rebadged “Master” once the cheaper Standard Six joined the lineup in February 1933, giving Chevrolet a proper two-tier range for the first time.
Small Six, Big Presence
The rest of the Series CA lineup rode on a stretched 110-inch wheelbase and introduced a three-speed synchromesh manual transmission, a genuine advance for the era, backed by four-wheel mechanical brakes. Fisher Body’s No-Draft ventilation system gave buyers fresh air without the wind-in-your-face compromise older roadsters demanded. Tie all of that to the styling – the V-shaped radiator, the beaver-tail back panel, the rear-slanting louvers – and you’ve got a generation of Chevrolet that still turns heads at any show field today, decades after it was built to survive nothing more glamorous than a Depression-era commute.
Two Series, One Strategy
Chevrolet’s 1933 lineup split into two distinct series to cover more of the market at once: the upscale Master Six, which the roadster pictured here represents, and the cheaper Standard Six aimed at buyers who wanted a Chevrolet badge without paying for the longer wheelbase and extra trim. That two-tier approach let Chevrolet compete simultaneously against Ford’s low-priced offerings and slightly more upscale independents, a strategy the company would keep refining for decades afterward.
Why the Six-Cylinder Made Sense in 1933
Chevrolet’s valve-in-head “Stovebolt” six had already built a reputation for durability and smooth running by the early 1930s, and its modest 60 horsepower output was plenty for a lightweight roadster body riding on a 110-inch wheelbase. Buyers cross-shopping against Ford’s flathead V8, introduced that same model year, often found Chevrolet’s six-cylinder easier to service and more forgiving to drive, even if it gave up some outright power to Ford’s newer engine.
Styling That Pointed Toward the Future
The skirted fenders, slanted louvered hood, and V-shaped radiator shell on this roadster were more than cosmetic flourishes; they represented Chevrolet’s early experiments with the kind of integrated, streamlined styling that would come to define American cars later in the decade. Features like the beaver-tail rear deck and rounded body panels stood in visible contrast to the boxier, more upright cars Chevrolet had been building just a few years earlier.
A Roadster Built for a Vanishing Body Style
Open roadsters like this one, with their fold-down top and minimal weather protection, were already becoming a smaller slice of the overall market by the early 1930s as buyers increasingly favored enclosed sedans and coupes for daily use. That shift makes surviving examples of the 1933 Series CA roadster particularly interesting to collectors today, since the body style itself represents a fading chapter of automotive history rather than just a specific model year.
Collecting Pre-War Chevrolets Today
Compared to the muscle cars that would define Chevrolet’s reputation three decades later, well-preserved pre-war models like this 1933 roadster remain a relatively accessible entry point for collectors interested in the brand’s earlier history. Active clubs dedicated to pre-war Chevrolets, along with a healthy parts and restoration community, make ownership more practical than many enthusiasts might expect for a car pushing a century old.
Ford’s New V8 Changed the Conversation
Ford’s introduction of its own flathead V8 for the 1932 model year, carried into 1933 as a genuine sales weapon, put real pressure on Chevrolet to justify sticking with a six-cylinder engine at a time when V8 power was becoming a major selling point. Chevrolet’s answer was to emphasize the Stovebolt six’s smoothness, reliability, and lower operating costs, arguments that clearly resonated with Depression-era buyers who valued dependability over outright bragging rights on paper.
A Wheelbase Stretch That Improved the Ride
The Series CA’s 110-inch wheelbase represented a genuine increase over Chevrolet’s prior year models, giving the 1933 lineup a noticeably smoother ride and more stable highway manners than the shorter, choppier-riding cars it replaced. That extra length also gave stylists more room to work with when shaping the skirted fenders and beaver-tail rear deck that make this particular roadster’s silhouette so recognizable to collectors today.
What the No-Draft Ventilation System Solved
Before Fisher Body’s No-Draft ventilation arrived, most closed cars and even some open cars of the era forced occupants to choose between stale air and a chilly, wind-blown cabin whenever windows needed adjusting for fresh air. The system used small pivoting vent panes built into the front door glass, letting outside air circulate into the cabin without the buffeting that came from simply cracking a main window, a small comfort feature that made the 1933 Chevrolet lineup noticeably more pleasant to drive on longer trips than cars that lacked it.
Share your thoughts in the comments below.
Republished by Blog Post Promoter


















