1968 Chevelle SS Crash

At a Good Guys car show in May 2013, a 1968 Chevelle SS clipped a concrete barrier during an autocross run — and more than a decade later, the comments are still debating whether the course itself was the real problem. Between complaints about missing hay bales, no helmets, and an oversized figure-8 layout, this brief fender-bender turned into a lasting argument about event safety. Watch to see how close it actually came to being much worse.

A fender got dented at a car show autocross in 2013, and thirteen years later people are still arguing about whose fault it was. Not the driver’s — the course’s. When a ’68 Chevelle SS came around too hot and kissed a wall, the wall in question turned out to be poured concrete, sitting a few feet from the cones. What should have been a forgettable low-speed off has instead become a permanent case study in event safety, and the comments section reads like a small claims court.

Good Guys, Bad Barrier

The footage comes from a Good Guys Car Show dated May 18, 2013 — one of the long-running Good Guys Rod & Custom Association events that have been staples of the classic car circuit for decades, typically combining a car show with autocross-style driving activities for owners who want to actually use their cars rather than just park them. Most years, incidents at these events are minor and quickly forgotten. This one stuck around specifically because of where the course placed its barriers, not because of anything unusual about the driving itself.

⚑ Featured Gear

Start Car Conversations →

As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

Why Concrete and Classics Don’t Mix

Multiple commenters zero in on the same issue: the course ran concrete barriers within just five or six feet of the cones, rather than the hay bales or tire walls more commonly used at autocross events involving vintage cars. ‘That was a great idea putting a concrete wall within 5 feet of the autocross course… in fact brilliant idea,’ one commenter writes sarcastically, and several others echo the same complaint independently. Soft barriers exist specifically to absorb an off-course excursion rather than stop it dead, and their absence here is the single detail that turned a low-speed mistake into actual sheet metal damage.

A Muscle Car Built to Go Straight

‘Classic muscle cars are not built to do anything but go fast in a straight line,’ one commenter states, and it’s a fair technical point. Factory suspension geometry, tire compounds, and steering setups from the muscle car era were engineered around straight-line acceleration, not the tight, technical cornering an autocross course demands. Asking a 1968 Chevelle SS to navigate cones the way a purpose-built sports car would is already asking a lot of the platform before a single barrier gets involved, and several commenters frame the entire course design as a mismatch between the cars invited and the challenge they were given.

The Owner’s Own ’70 Chevelle Story

One commenter offers firsthand testimony that backs up the broader critique: ‘I had a ’70 Chevelle in high school. Handled like a yacht but crazy awesome acceleration. Was wonderful fun doing doughnuts but wouldn’t have dreamed of a slalom course.’ That kind of direct experience carries more weight than pure speculation — someone who actually owned a comparable Chevelle confirms that the handling limitations aren’t internet exaggeration, they’re a real, lived characteristic of the platform. It’s the kind of comment that shifts the conversation away from blaming the driver and squarely onto the event’s own course design.

No Helmets, an Oversized Figure-8

One particularly detailed comment lists the entire safety case against the event: concrete barriers within six feet of the cones, an oversized figure-8 layout, and no helmets required for drivers. Taken individually, each point is debatable. Stacked together, they paint a picture of an event that hadn’t fully thought through what happens when a heavy, straight-line-oriented muscle car misjudges a tight corner at speed. Safety standards at grassroots car events have generally tightened significantly since 2013, and comments like this one are part of the informal pressure that pushes organizers toward better barriers, mandatory helmets, and more forgiving course layouts over time.

It Could Have Been Much Worse

Amid all the criticism, several commenters take a step back to note how limited the actual damage turned out to be. ‘It could have been a LOT worse, thankfully it was just the corner of the car,’ one writes, and another points out the damage ‘not too severe, but still’ worth talking about. A low-speed clip against a fixed concrete barrier could easily have ended in a totaled front end or a serious injury; instead, this Chevelle walked away with cosmetic damage to one corner, which is likely the only reason this video exists as an amusing case study rather than a cautionary tale with a much darker ending.

A ’68 That’s Probably Already Fixed

More than a decade on, this specific Chevelle SS has almost certainly been repaired, repainted, and driven plenty of miles since its brief moment of internet infamy. Fender damage on a car this desirable rarely stays unrepaired for long, and the video itself has taken on a life of its own separate from whatever actually happened to the car afterward. What remains online is less a record of one car’s bad day than a permanent, still-active debate about how car shows should run their driving events — proof that a single low-speed mistake at a 2013 autocross can outlive the dent it caused by many, many years.

The Video That Refuses to Die

Part of why this clip keeps resurfacing, according to one comment, is the dramatic camera work: ‘I love how the camera dips like it’s a fatality… dude it’s a ’68, it’s just a little fender bender.’ That gap between the visual drama of the footage and the actual, minor outcome is exactly what keeps this video in circulation more than a decade after it was filmed. It’s not really a crash video in the way the title suggests — it’s a safety debate with a fender bender attached, and that combination has proven far more durable than the damage itself ever was.

A Course Built for the Wrong Kind of Car

One commenter puts it bluntly: ‘this course is best suited to MG Midgets and Minis,’ small, nimble European cars built specifically for tight, technical driving rather than raw acceleration. Running a heavy, straight-line-oriented Chevelle SS through the same layout was always going to expose the mismatch eventually, and this video is simply the moment it did. It’s a reminder that a course designed with one kind of car in mind doesn’t automatically suit every car invited to run on it.

Watch the full video and tell us what you think — comments are open below.

Share your thoughts in the comments below.

Republished by Blog Post Promoter