BADDEST CUDA ON THE PLANET ? 1971 Plymouth & Engine Sound

Jesse Matlock has owned this 1971 Plymouth ‘Cuda since 2010, but it took roughly 7,000 hours — about three and a half years of build time — to turn it into the car he calls ‘Striker.’ Lou Costabile caught up with Matlock at the World of Wheels Car Show in Rosemont, Illinois to hear the story behind the paint, the fabrication, and the name. Watch to see what earns a restomod the title of baddest Cuda on the planet.

Most builders will tell you a car is ‘done’ the day it rolls off the lift and onto the show floor. Jesse Matlock never got that memo. He has owned this 1971 Plymouth Cuda since 2010, and by the time he wheeled it into Rosemont, Illinois for the World of Wheels show, the clock on this build read something close to 7,000 hours — roughly three and a half years of a man’s life poured into sheet metal and paint. He gave the finished car a name, Striker, for reasons that only make sense once you see what’s under the hood. Lou Costabile caught up with him to find out why.

Seven Thousand Hours and a Name That Means Something

Jesse Matlock has owned this 1971 Plymouth Cuda since 2010, but ‘owned’ undersells what actually happened over the following years. As the video’s description lays out, the build ran roughly 7,000 hours — three and a half years of dedicated labor — before Matlock ever rolled the car into the World of Wheels Car Show in Rosemont, Illinois on March 8, 2018. He named the finished product Striker because, in his words, it was the first car built to strike this particular combination of details, a claim that becomes easier to believe the longer you look at the paint, the engine bay, and the fabrication work packed into every corner of the car.

⚑ Featured Gear

Start Car Conversations →

As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

Why Fellow Builders Vouch For This One

On forums and comment sections, plenty of restomod builds get praised by strangers who never touched the car. This one is different — someone who has actually worked alongside Jesse weighed in directly, describing him as a close friend who has done body work on their own vehicles and calling his craftsmanship second to none. That kind of endorsement from another set of hands who knows exactly how hard this work is carries more weight than a compliment from a stranger scrolling past a thumbnail.

The Case for the Stock 1970s Cuda

Not every viewer wanted the exterior overhaul. Several commenters pushed back gently, arguing that a factory-original 1970s interior and stock elements actually out-badass anything a modern build shop can bolt on, insisting the original Cuda design needed no modern reinterpretation to turn heads. It’s a fair point, and it says something about how polarizing a full custom build can be among Mopar loyalists — even when, as multiple other commenters noted, the final result is objectively stunning.

A Paint Job That Stopped the Show Floor

The red on this Cuda is not a subtle red. Viewers repeatedly singled out the paint before mentioning anything mechanical, with one comment comparing the finish to Christmas lights for how it seems to glow under show lighting. Between the depth of the color, the custom wheel choice, and the panel gaps that only come from thousands of hours of bodywork, it’s the kind of paint job that photographs differently depending on the angle of the sun — exactly the effect a builder chasing 7,000 hours of work is aiming for.

What’s Actually Under the Shaker Hood

A build this extensive is never just cosmetic. Viewers who caught the engine bay reveal called it magnificent, and the working hood scoop functions exactly as it did when Plymouth engineers designed the Shaker system in the early 1970s — visibly shaking with the engine’s own movement at idle, a detail that separates a real functional build from a static show trailer queen. That the dash and underside carry the same attention to detail as the paint tells you Matlock was not chasing a single wow angle for photos; he built the whole car to the same standard.

The 1971 Cuda’s Place in the Barracuda Story

The 1971 model year sits at a strange crossroads for the Barracuda nameplate. It was the last year for the quad-headlight front end that collectors now consider the most aggressive of the third-generation cars, and Plymouth built far fewer 1971s than the 1970 models that came before them, since the platform was already nearing the end of its run before the 1974 discontinuation. A 1971 Cuda reimagined this thoroughly, rather than restored to factory spec, sidesteps the numbers-matching debate entirely — nobody is asking what engine code it left the factory with, because the build itself has become the story.

Custom Builds vs. Numbers-Matching Restorations

There’s a real divide in the Mopar world between owners chasing concours-correct restorations and owners like Matlock building something entirely their own. A numbers-matching ’71 Cuda in original condition can command serious money at auction precisely because it is unmodified, while a car like Striker will never qualify for that category — and clearly was never meant to. What it offers instead is unlimited creative freedom: custom paint, modern fabrication, and mechanical choices no factory floor in 1971 would have allowed, all wrapped around a body style that still reads unmistakably as a first-generation Cuda silhouette.

Why This Build Still Matters at Car Shows Today

World of Wheels events like the one in Rosemont exist specifically to showcase builds like this one — cars where the goal was never just to drive, but to represent thousands of hours of a single person’s vision. Years after Matlock first bought this Cuda, and years after this particular show appearance, Striker still gets circulated and discussed among Mopar fans precisely because it threads a difficult needle: modern enough to shock people expecting a stock ’71, faithful enough to the Barracuda’s DNA that nobody mistakes what they’re looking at.

The Channel Behind the Story

Lou Costabile’s My Car Story has built a loyal following specifically by finding builds like this one at regional shows rather than sticking to marquee national events, letting him surface cars that a bigger production would likely miss entirely. That grassroots approach is part of why a build with this much invested in it — 7,000 hours from a private owner rather than a professional shop with a marketing budget — got the kind of attention and detailed on-camera interview it deserved, rather than a quick drive-by shot at a crowded show.

See the full video above and join the conversation in the comments.

Share your thoughts in the comments below.

Republished by Blog Post Promoter