EngineLabs LS vs Coyote Shootout: The Winner Crowned

EngineLabs and the Horsepower Wars crew settled the endless LS-versus-Coyote debate the only way that counts: two engine builds, a strict $9,999 budget each, and a dyno at the respected Westech Performance Group that doesn’t care about brand loyalty. The results compare more than peak horsepower, weighing efficiency and power delivery across the curve for both platforms. See which engine came out on top — and why the argument still won’t die in the comments.

Few debates in American car culture run as deep, or as personal, as LS versus Coyote — the pushrod GM small-block against Ford’s modern overhead-cam V8, argued in comment sections and cruise-in parking lots with a fervor usually reserved for actual sports rivalries. EngineLabs and the Horsepower Wars crew decided to settle it the only way that actually means anything: two real engine builds, a strict $9,999 budget for each, and a dyno that doesn’t care which brand badge is bolted to the valve covers.

Why a Budget Cap Changes Everything

Capping each build at $9,999 was the decision that made this shootout matter beyond internet arguments, because it forced both engine platforms to compete on realistic, attainable terms rather than unlimited-budget dyno queens that no regular enthusiast could ever replicate in their own garage on a weekend budget. A shootout without that constraint just proves that money buys horsepower — this one proves something more useful: which platform gives an average builder more power per dollar actually spent.

⚑ Featured Gear

Start Car Conversations →

As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

The Case for the LS

The LS platform’s advantages have always centered on its simplicity and displacement-per-dollar value — a pushrod design that’s mechanically simpler than an overhead-cam engine, with a massive aftermarket built around decades of GM small-block heritage that keeps parts costs down even as power goals climb higher and higher. On a strict budget, that combination of cheap parts and forgiving architecture has historically given the LS an edge that’s hard for any rival platform to match dollar for dollar.

The Case for the Coyote

Ford’s Coyote counters with genuinely modern engineering — dual overhead cams, four valves per cylinder, and a rev range that lets it make power the LS’s two-valve pushrod design simply can’t access, at the cost of complexity that tends to make performance parts pricier and installation less forgiving for a budget-conscious builder working alone in a home garage. It’s the classic tradeoff between an old-school architecture refined over decades and a newer design still catching up on aftermarket support and affordability.

Where the Filming Actually Happened

The dyno work for this shootout took place at Westech Performance Group, one of the most respected independent dyno and engine development facilities in the industry — founded in part by John Baechtel, a former Car Craft and Hot Rod magazine editor whose decades in enthusiast media helped the shop build relationships across the entire performance industry. That pedigree is exactly why a shootout like this one lands at a facility both sides of the LS-versus-Coyote argument can trust to call it straight.

Efficiency and Packaging, Not Just Peak Numbers

According to the video’s own framing, this shootout wasn’t purely about which engine hit the highest peak horsepower number — it specifically set out to compare power delivery across the curve, considering both efficiency and packaging, a more nuanced approach than simply crowning whichever build posts the bigger number on a single dyno pull. That distinction matters to anyone actually planning a build, since a peaky, hard-to-drive engine with a huge peak number often loses to a broader, more usable power curve once it’s actually installed in a street car.

A Rivalry That Refuses to Resolve

Even with a clear winner declared, the comment section shows the LS-versus-Coyote debate isn’t going anywhere — viewers who grew up on the argument note they’ve since “grown up” past brand loyalty, while plenty of others simply doubled down on their preferred platform regardless of what the dyno sheet ultimately said about either engine’s performance.

Part of a Larger Media Network

EngineLabs is one piece of Power Automedia’s larger network of enthusiast-focused publications covering everything from Mustangs to drag racing to diesel trucks, meaning a shootout like this one exists within a much bigger ecosystem of technical, brand-specific content built for exactly the kind of reader who cares enough to watch a full engine comparison video all the way to its conclusion.

A Real-World Parts and Pricing Guide

A budget-capped shootout like this one also serves a practical purpose beyond settling arguments — it functions as a real-world parts and pricing guide for anyone actually planning a similar build, documenting exactly what components fit within a $9,999 ceiling for each platform and what tradeoffs each engine’s architecture forces a budget builder to accept along the way.

Why This Comparison Ages Well

Comparisons like this one also tend to age unusually well compared to most car content, since the fundamental architecture differences between a pushrod small-block and a modern overhead-cam V8 don’t change from year to year the way trim levels and paint options do, keeping a video like this relevant to builders planning their own engine swap years after the original upload.

Why Horsepower Wars Builds Around Head-to-Heads

Horsepower Wars as a franchise has built its identity specifically around head-to-head shootouts like this one rather than single-engine dyno pulls, recognizing that direct comparison content generates far more engagement and repeat viewership than a standalone build video ever could on its own, no matter how impressive the final numbers turn out to be.

How Far the Coyote Has Closed the Gap

The specific choice of a Coyote engine, rather than an older Ford modular V8, also signals how far Ford’s own architecture has evolved since the days when the LS enjoyed a much clearer performance-per-dollar advantage — the Coyote closing that gap is itself part of why this shootout carries more weight today than a similar comparison would have a decade earlier.

For builders still undecided on which platform to commit to, videos like this one rarely deliver a final, universal verdict so much as a clearer picture of the tradeoffs involved — and in a hobby built as much around personal identity and brand loyalty as raw performance data, that clearer picture is sometimes the most useful outcome a shootout can actually provide.

Either way, the argument will keep running long after this particular dyno sheet gets filed away, which is exactly what keeps content like this coming back around every few years with a new budget and a new pair of engines.

Nobody involved seems to want it settled for good anyway.

Watch the full video and drop your thoughts in the comments below.

Share your thoughts in the comments below.

Republished by Blog Post Promoter