McLaren MP4-12C vs 1970 Chevelle SS 396 – Joke Comparison & 1/4 Mile Drag Race – Road Test TV

A ,000 McLaren MP4-12C and its 616 horsepower twin-turbo V8 take on a stock, all-original 1970 Chevelle SS 396 that once sold for around ,200. The video calls it a joke comparison, but the Chevelle runs a genuinely respectable 13.7 seconds and the comments turned it into something more interesting than a punchline. One viewer did the math: the McLaren has already lost ,000 in value while the Chevelle has gained roughly the same amount. Watch the run, then read why almost nobody in the comments picked the McLaren.

Two cars pull up to the same line separated by a price gap of nearly ,000 and forty years of engineering, and the joke is supposed to write itself. A ,000 supercar with paddle shifters and a dual-clutch transmission against a forty-year-old American sedan that once stickered for less than a modern economy car should not require a second thought. Except the internet did not laugh at the setup the way the video’s own title suggests it should. Instead, viewers did math nobody asked them to do, and the numbers they found are the real reason this video will not stop getting watched.

A ,000 Supercar Meets a ,200 Sedan

The supercar in question is a 2013 McLaren MP4-12C, a ,000 mid-engine exotic built around a 3.8 liter twin-turbo V8 producing 616 horsepower, sending power through a seven-speed dual-clutch gearbox with paddle shifters mounted behind the steering wheel. Every part of its drivetrain was engineered specifically to minimize shift time and maximize traction off the line, technology that simply did not exist when its opponent rolled off an American assembly line decades earlier.

⚑ Featured Gear

Start Car Conversations →

← Prev Next →

As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

What the McLaren Actually Brings to the Line

That opponent is a 1970 Chevrolet Chevelle SS powered by the 396 cubic inch V8, a car that in period cost a fraction of the McLaren’s price and shifted gears the old-fashioned way, through a driver’s own arm and a four-speed Muncie transmission with a bicep doing the work no computer ever will. The video’s own framing calls this a joke comparison, and on raw output numbers between a 616 horsepower twin-turbo exotic and a forty-plus-year-old naturally aspirated big block, that framing makes sense on the surface. The Chevelle’s Muncie four-speed, in particular, demanded a level of driver skill that modern paddle-shift technology was specifically engineered to eliminate – miss a shift or bog the launch and the whole run is over before it starts, a risk that simply does not exist behind the McLaren’s wheel.

The Comment That Explains Everything

What actually elevated this video beyond a simple comedy bit is a single comment that has become something close to the unofficial thesis statement for the entire race: the McLaren was ,000 new and has already lost roughly ,000 in value, while the Chevelle cost around ,200 new and is now worth roughly ,000 itself. Appreciation versus depreciation, defined in a single side-by-side comparison, is not the kind of insight most viewers expect to walk away with from a quarter-mile drag race video.

Why 13.7 Seconds Stock Still Matters

The Chevelle’s actual performance in this race deserves credit entirely separate from that financial framing. Running 13.7 seconds in the quarter mile on what the video describes as an all-original, stock 396, with no modifications, is a genuinely respectable number even measured against modern performance cars, and several commenters pointed out exactly that: a completely stock, four-decade-old muscle car running mid-13s is nothing to laugh at, joke comparison or not.

An Unusual Consensus in the Comments

The comment section split almost unanimously in the Chevelle’s favor, which is worth noting given that the video technically pits an objectively faster, more expensive, more technologically advanced car against it. Commenter after commenter said they would rather own the Chevelle regardless of the McLaren’s straight-line speed advantage, with one making the case explicitly: given the option, they would rather have the Chevy, sell it eventually, and use the proceeds to buy two more just like it. It is a rare moment of internet consensus, especially on a video built around comparing two cars from opposite ends of the automotive spectrum, and it says something about how differently people value performance history versus outright specification sheets.

This Was Never Really About Speed

That preference is not really about outright performance at all, and the comments make that clear. One viewer put it simply, saying that no matter how impressive modern speed and technology gets, nothing beats the way good old American muscle looks and sounds, whether it is flying down the strip or just cruising, and that the experience itself carries real value beyond the numbers a stopwatch produces. It is an emotional argument, not a spec sheet argument, and it is exactly the argument this video’s comment section has been having for years.

How Collector Values Actually Move Over Time

There is a broader lesson here about how collector car values actually move over time, one that this specific matchup illustrates almost too perfectly to have been planned. Modern exotics depreciate the moment they leave the dealership, following the same curve as any other new car, just starting from a much higher number. Muscle cars from the 1960s and 1970s, meanwhile, bottomed out decades ago and have spent the years since climbing steadily as the generation that grew up wanting one finally has the means to buy it back.

Giving the McLaren Its Due

None of this is meant to diminish what the McLaren MP4-12C actually is, a genuinely important car in its own right, built during McLaren’s return to producing road cars after decades focused almost entirely on Formula 1. But putting it next to a stock 1970 Chevelle SS 396 accidentally created one of the more thought-provoking automotive comparisons on the internet, not because of what either car does on the strip, but because of what happens to their price tags in the decades after the sale. McLaren’s road-car division was still finding its footing in 2013, and the MP4-12C would go on to be revised repeatedly in the years that followed as the company refined its approach – which makes this early example something of a historical footnote in its own right, not just a punchline against a stock Chevelle.

The Real Conversation Worth Having

Watch the actual run for what it is, a straightforward quarter-mile pass between two very different kinds of fast. Then read through the comments, because the real conversation this video started is not about which car crossed the line first.

Hit play on the full video and share your take in the comments below.

Republished by Blog Post Promoter

Related posts:

McLaren MP4-12C vs 1970 Chevelle SS 396 – Joke Comparison & 1/4 Mile Drag Race Old School Muscle vs New School Muscle !! Hemi Cuda vs Hellcat !! 426 Hemi GTX vs 440 / 6 Pack Challenger – 1/4 Mile Drag Race & Burn Out Video – Road Test TV 1968 Dodge Charger R/T vs 1965 GTO Tri-Power 1/4 mile Drag Race – Road Test TV Rare L88 427 Corvette vs Olds 442 W30 – 1/4 Mile Drag Race – Old School – Road Test TV Rare 440 – 6 Pack Road Runner vs Chevelle SS 396 – 1/4 Mile Drag Race – Road Test TV 426 Hemi Road Runner vs 426 Hemi Super Bee – 1/4 Mile Drag Race Video – Road Test TV Super Cobra Jet Torino vs Olds 442 400 w/Tri Power – 1/4 mile Video – Pure Stock – Road Test TV 428 Cobra Jet Cougar Eliminator vs Chevelle SS396 – 1/4 mile Drag Race Video – Road Test TV Rare Yenko Nova vs Supercharged Studebaker Challenger R3 – 1/4 mile Drag Race Video – Road Test TV