Nobody buys a muscle car for its crash test rating, but that is exactly what the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety decided to measure, putting a trio of iconic sports coupes through its full battery of tests in 2016. Not one of them earned a TOP SAFETY PICK award. Watch the full IIHS release to see how speed and safety stacked up against each other.
Muscle cars get bought for straight-line speed, exhaust note, and the kind of presence that turns heads in a parking lot — safety ratings are rarely part of the sales pitch. So when the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety decided to run a trio of iconic sports coupes through its full battery of crash tests, the results were never going to read like a typical IIHS press release. What they found says less about any one car being unsafe and more about what an entire category of car has historically prioritized, and it is worth understanding before signing on the dotted line.
Speed Sells, Safety Scores Do Not Always Follow
IIHS opens its own release by acknowledging the obvious: nobody buys a muscle car imagining crash test ratings, they buy it for power and image. That gap between what buyers care about and what safety testing measures is exactly why the Institute felt this particular test was worth publishing — because the assumption that a modern car is automatically a safe car does not hold evenly across every segment.
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.
Which Cars Went Under the Microscope
According to the release, IIHS tested a trio of iconic sports coupes, running each through its full suite of crash evaluations rather than a single headline test. That kind of comprehensive approach is what separates a real IIHS rating from a marketing claim, since it accounts for structural integrity, occupant protection, and crash avoidance technology together rather than any one metric in isolation.
Why None of Them Earned Top Safety Pick
The headline result is stark: not a single one of the tested coupes earned the scores required for a TOP SAFETY PICK award, the Institute benchmark distinction for genuinely safe vehicles. That does not mean these cars are dangerous outright, but it does mean they fall short of the standard IIHS considers necessary for its top recommendation, a gap that stands out precisely because these are current-generation vehicles, not decades-old classics.
What This Means for Muscle Car Buyers Today
For anyone cross-shopping modern muscle cars, this release is a reminder that horsepower figures and safety ratings are separate conversations, and a car excelling at one does not guarantee anything about the other. It does not have to be a dealbreaker, but it is exactly the kind of information worth knowing before the test drive turns into a signature on the paperwork.
IIHS Track Record With Performance Cars
Sports and muscle cars have historically posed a challenge for crash testing programs, since their lower ride height, stiffer chassis tuning, and performance-focused engineering do not always translate into the kind of structural crash protection that family sedans are optimized for. This is not the first time IIHS has flagged that gap, and results like this one continue to push manufacturers toward treating safety engineering as a genuine design priority rather than an afterthought bolted onto a performance platform. For shoppers who prioritize outright performance, that tradeoff might be an acceptable one, but going in with open eyes about where a favorite nameplate actually lands on safety, rather than assuming modern automatically means safe, is the kind of informed decision-making this release was clearly designed to support. It is a reminder that the marketing language wrapped around any new performance car rarely mentions crash test performance unless the news is good, which is exactly why independent testing from an organization like IIHS remains one of the few reliable ways buyers can actually compare safety outcomes across an entire vehicle segment.
Watch the full video and share your thoughts below.
Republished by Blog Post Promoter










