Alfa Romeo built a car named after Montreal, unveiled it at Expo 67 in Montreal, and then never legally sold a single new example in Canada or anywhere else in North America. Fewer than 4,000 were built, and the word Montreal appears on the car exactly once, hidden on the ashtray cover. Under the hood sits a detuned racing V8 from a sports prototype. Read on for how one of Bertone’s most striking shapes became a car almost nobody on this continent could buy.
There is a car that carries the name of a Canadian city on its badge, was unveiled to the world in that same city, and yet was never legally sold as a new car anywhere in Canada, the United States or Mexico. Not a single one. The name itself was never even the manufacturer’s idea, and if you go looking for the word on the car you will find it in exactly one place, and it is not on the fender, the tail panel, or the dashboard. Fewer than four thousand were built across the entire production run, and the engine under the hood started life in a car built to win sports car races rather than to sit in a driveway.
A Car Named for a City That Never Got to Buy It
The absurdity of the situation deserves stating plainly before anything else. A Canadian buyer in 1972 could stand on a street in the city the car was named after, having personally watched it debut there five years earlier, and be legally unable to buy one from a dealer. Total production reached 3,917 cars across the entire run, none of them sold new in Canada, the United States or Mexico. The commonly repeated estimate is that only around one hundred examples exist anywhere in the Americas today, with perhaps a dozen of those in California, and every one of them arrived as a private import rather than through a distributor. That is an unusually cruel piece of automotive irony, and it is the first thing anyone learns about the car.
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.
Expo 67 and the Prototype Nobody Could Name
The car is the Alfa Romeo Montreal, and the story starts at Expo 67, the world’s fair held in Montreal during Canada’s centennial year. Alfa Romeo was asked to display something representing the highest aspiration of the automotive field, and it brought a Bertone-bodied two-seat coupe with no official name at all. The public simply called it the Montreal, after the city, and the name stuck so firmly that Alfa eventually adopted it. The only place the word appears on a production car is the ashtray cover, which is either a charming detail or an unforced error depending on how you feel about badges.
Gandini’s Details, and Which Ones Are Exclusive
The body came out of Bertone’s studio under Marcello Gandini, the same designer responsible for the 1966 Lamborghini Miura. The family resemblance is obvious once you know to look for it, particularly in the B-pillar vents and the way the greenhouse meets the rear quarters. Three details are unique to this car and worth memorizing if you want to identify one on sight: the slatted eyelash covers over the headlights, the non-functional NACA-style scoop in the hood, and the row of speed strakes set into the body behind the doors. The hood scoop leads nowhere. It exists because it looks correct, and it does.
The Racing Engine Hiding Under the Hood
What sits beneath that hood is the reason enthusiasts still chase these cars. Alfa fitted a 2.6 liter all-alloy dual overhead cam V8 derived from the engine used in the Tipo 33 sports prototype racer, detuned for road use and fed by SPICA mechanical fuel injection. It produced roughly 200 horsepower and revved with the eagerness that only a small-displacement racing derived V8 delivers. Behind it sat a five-speed ZF gearbox. Top speed was reported around 137 mph, which in the early 1970s put a Montreal in genuinely serious company for a car most buyers had never heard of.
Ordinary Bones Under an Extraordinary Body
The rest of the car is deliberately conventional, and that is not a criticism. The floorpan, suspension and general underpinnings come from Alfa’s 105-series Giulia Sprint GT, which means double wishbones on coil springs up front and a live rear axle out back rather than anything exotic. The advantage is that Montreals can be kept alive using knowledge and parts from a much larger family of cars. The disadvantage is that a chassis engineered for a nimble 1.6 liter coupe is being asked to carry a considerably heavier and more powerful machine, and period road testers noticed. The cockpit, by contrast, is pure theater, with a deep dash and an instrument layout that feels closer to an aircraft than a sedan.
Labor Unrest, Geneva, and a Three Year Delay
Production did not follow quickly from the show car. Italy’s industrial labor unrest at the end of the 1960s reached both the Bertone works and Alfa’s own plants, with strikes and demonstrations disrupting output for extended periods. The Montreal next appeared publicly at the Geneva Motor Show in 1970, and it was 1971 before finished cars began reaching customers. That gap between a rapturous 1967 debut and a 1971 delivery date cost the car much of its momentum, and it never recovered the sense of being the newest thing in the room.
Why It Was Never Federalized for America
The North American absence came down to regulation. By the time the Montreal was ready to sell, the United States had emissions and safety standards that a low-volume Italian coupe with mechanical fuel injection would have needed a dedicated engineering program to meet, and Alfa did not commit one. Canada largely followed the American lead. The result is that the only Montreals on this continent are grey-market imports brought in privately over the decades, and the commonly repeated estimate is that only around one hundred exist in the Americas, with roughly a dozen of those in California.
What Fewer Than 4,000 Cars Are Worth Today
With 3,917 built worldwide and a survival rate typical of complex Italian cars from the era, the Montreal has moved from curiosity to genuine collectible. Values climbed sharply once collectors worked out that they were buying detuned Tipo 33 architecture in a Gandini body for a fraction of what either of those ingredients costs separately. The catch is ownership: the SPICA injection system demands a specialist who actually understands it, and a neglected one will empty a bank account. Buy the best example you can find rather than the cheapest project. Share your thoughts in the comments below.
Republished by Blog Post Promoter











Had one of those once but it keeped breaching down but it was fun